profile
friends
archive
entries
 
 
01 May 2008 @ 06:00 pm
London mayoral elections  
It's polling day here in London, everybody do the democracy dance!

I actually like the politics of all three main candidates, but my reaction to the campaign has been ">:O UNIMPRESSED FACE" due to the endless debates over important topics such as whether buses should be RouteMasters or bendy buses. Never mind housing, civil rights, or other transport issues, let's discuss the shapes of buses some more! Srsly?

However, I do think the electoral system in London is a vast improvement on the ludicrous first-past-the-post system used in national elections, which is antiquated enough to make even the most enthusiastic politico despondent. In London, you get to vote for first and second choice for mayor, and if there is not a clear winner (ie more than 50%) of the first votes, then a second round counts both first and second votes. You also get to two other votes, one for your local representative and one for a party for the London Assembly.

This is good for several reasons: you get to differentiate between your choice of mayoral candidate, one usually based on the personality and policies of the candidates, and your Assembly and representative choices, usually based on political affiliation. Also, it lessens the need for tactical voting: for example, where I was brought up is a massively Conservative area, so I used to vote Labour even though I'm a Liberal Democrat supporter because Labour are more likely to dent the Conservative lead. In the mayoral elections, however, I voted Paddick (Lib Dem) as first choice, because I'm a liberal at heart, and Ken (Labour) as second, because I'd rather have him than Boris (Conservative), and that's the real race.

I must say though, I have been hugely unimpressed with all the Boris bashing going on at the moment. Both real life friends and people on LJ have told me that "If you vote for Boris, it means you're an idiot and you don't understand anything about politics." This really pisses me off. I seriously considered voting for Boris, not because he's charming (though he is) or because I thought it would be funny (though it would), but because he's an extremely intelligent and capable man. I don't share his political values, but I do respect him and his experience, and I genuinely believe that beneath all the bluster there is a very sharp mind, and I believe he could run the city very well. Unlike Ken or Paddick, whose values I share but I have very little respect for.

I love Boris. He has some really good ideas, he's dedicated and personable and I would love to have him round to my house for tea. I would do Boris. However, in the end I decided to vote for Ken, the weasely little git, because although I want to punch him in his smug face, I think he's done an excellent job of running the city thus far.
Tags:
 
 
Current Mood: busy
Current Music: Vladimir Ashkenazy - Rachmaninov - Piano Concerto No.2 in C minor
 
 
( Post a new comment )
♠: Misc - Stephen![info]landfill_sky on May 1st, 2008 05:42 pm (UTC)
You know what Queenie? You're one of the first people I've heard actually speak rationally about this. I play a big part in Conservative Future; and even though I'm not a Londoner I've been working hard on the Back Boris campaign. The main thing we have to work against are the people who think Boris is just a stupid bumbling idiot. Which is tosh. If you don't want to vote for him then let it be because you don't agree with his policies or you think someone else could do better. Not because of stupid misconceptions.
Queenie: RETRO[info]mortari on May 1st, 2008 05:58 pm (UTC)
Yes, I think that's precisely what's been bothering me about the reaction among my friends. It's not that people particularly disagree with Boris, or particularly like Ken, but rather that they just think that Boris (and hence, anyone who supports him) is an idiot. I mean, sure, he's bumbling and occasionally he say inappropriate things, but he's abviously very aware of the issues facing London and he has good ideas. I think it helps to read his written work, I suspect he's rather more eloquent on paper than he is when speaking - I can sympathise with this, I'm just the same.

If people disagree with his policies, fine, but most just seem to dislike him on principle. And that's not just illogical, it's also hugely patronising to say that his supporters just don't understand politics.

Good for you for getting involved though, and standing up for your beliefs. :)
Tuuli: London the world around you[info]tuuli1109 on May 1st, 2008 05:56 pm (UTC)
That's actually really informative. The newspaper I usually read (or, er, its website) has mentioned the eletion only once as far as I can tell. Not that I have a particular interest in it - I'm just starting to get into politics as a whole, so learning about how things are done in places that aren't Finland or the USA is pretty cool. Cheers =)

Also, hi! :)
Queenie: RETRO[info]mortari on May 1st, 2008 06:37 pm (UTC)
Hi! Glad this was of interest. Local politics is where all the decision making actually happens in this country, but it used to be seriously uninteresting and unglamourous. They introduced the London mayor 8 years ago, and it's done alot to raise awareness of how the city is actually run. It's fun to be a part of it for the first time; I moved to London recently so this is the first time I've voted here. :D
A Chronic Insomniac: sga lorne painting[info]monkey_junkey on May 1st, 2008 06:40 pm (UTC)
I actually like the politics of all three main candidates, but my reaction to the campaign has been ">:O UNIMPRESSED FACE"

You made my morning XD
Alex[info]titanic_days on May 1st, 2008 06:47 pm (UTC)
I don't think there's any doubt that Boris is a very charming, funny and likeable sort of chap. I disconnect on his apparent homophobic views, but he seems a theatrical sort who probably wouldn't mind when he got up close, and I'd happily have him pop round for tea.

There's no doubt he's a very intelligent man either, and I think this is what makes him very dangerous to London. He projects this image of a bumbling idiot that a lot of people have fallen for because it's, well, almost refreshing in a way, but underneath that he's a very shrewd right-winger and would be incredibly bad for us. He's a very nasty piece of work, of this I am firmly convinced.

Which is why I voted for Ken.
Duncan MacLeod of the cloud MacClan![info]starcrossedgirl on May 1st, 2008 08:27 pm (UTC)
I suppose I fall into the guilty as charged catergory here with my slightly snarky comment this morning, but it was more meant as an expression of my opinion than seriously trying to imply that I'd be enraged at anybody who disagreed with me on this. In any case, sorry
if it came across more harshly than it was meant to.

I'm essentially with Alex, here - I am not saying that he is stupid (or that people who vote for him automatically are), but I do dislike his policies more than Ken's. I completely get where you're coming from with the mudslinging though - all the discussion of their private lives and affairs and etc and so forth was simply so irrelevant it pissed me the hell off.
Jay Oh[info]flats on May 1st, 2008 08:39 pm (UTC)
See my recent-ish LJ post for all this anti-Boris shit - glad to hear you're sane, though!

Much as I like the electoral system, it was really apparent at my polling station that *so many* people didn't understand how second choice votes worked. Consequently I'm quite concerned that there might be a huge number of 'spoilt' ballots that don't get counted... However, the system was clearly explained in the papers and in a govt. booklet sent to all voters, so they don't have much excuse. But if a system takes so much explaining, does that count against it? Will be looking at the stats on ballot errors with interest.
geek pie[info]kassie_opia on May 2nd, 2008 10:23 am (UTC)
I've always been a bit suspicious of Boris, since everyone at my school loves him, which has always been a perfectly good reason for me to dislike something... Although, he came to give a talk to the Classics society here, and he's clearly a very clever man - I'm pretty sure that slightly bumbling good-old-boy image is just a projection. If I lived in London - I don't - and if I was old enough to vote - give me eight months :P - I'd probably have voted for one of the others, possibly because I have been indoctrinated from an early age to be vehemently anti-Conservative, but it seems a bit silly to say that if you vote for him you don't know anything about politics.
Er. Yes. That's my two cents, anyway... not that it made very much sense..
PS. I've snagged a couple of your wallpapers, they're awesome.